Results of an open clinical trial with FH84 (Cernitin Pollen Extract) in patients with
Pollinosis
Mazzi Rodolfo
Lugano, Switzerland (1986)
Aim of trial
To evaluate the effect of FH84 in patients, who are allergic to flower pollen and suffering
from pollinosis. The trial should provide information on the improvement concerning the
symptoms (mainly Rhinitis and Conjunctivitis) and on the occurrence of adverse
(allergic) reactions. The patients have been treated in 4 centers.
Principal Investigator
Dr. R. Mazzi, Locarno, CH, Center 1
Co-Investigators
Dr. G. Bolognini, Mendrisio, CH, Center 2
Dr. S. Gilardi, Locarno, CH, Center 3
Dr. T. Pani, Lugano, CH, Center 4
Sponsors
Cernitin SA, Lugano, CH
Lagap SA, Lugano, CH
Dosage
1-2 sachets of FH84/day corresponding to 840mg T60 and 42mg GBX/sachet (1
sachet = 3g)
Period of treatment
March- July 1985 and 1986 respectively
Summary
FH84 taken prophylactically in early spring has caused a positive respond in 66% of a
collective of 45 patients suffering from pollinosis.
The patients have reported of an improvement of symptoms, especially concerning
Rhinitis, Conjunctivitis and Sneeze.
Age and sex of the patients did not significantly influence the result of the treatment.
The date of start of treatment, whether March or April did not influence the results.
There seemed to be a clear dose/response relation. Patients treated with 2 sachets per
day form by far the best group with only "good" or "completely disappeared" results.
No adverse reactions have been observed. Even a high dosage of FH84 (up to 1.6 gram
of Cernitin Pollen Extract) administered per os did not cause allergies patients usually
highly allergic to flower pollen.
Introduction
FH 84 contains as active ingredient a flower pollen extract, which is standardized in
composition and production process (called: Cernitin Pollen Extract).
During the spring of 1985 and 1986 respectively, 45 patients suffering from Pollinosis
have been treated with FH84 prophylactically to evaluate the effect of the drug on the
symptoms of Pollinosis.
An additional aim of the trial has been to evaluate the tolerability of the Cernitin Pollen
Extract, given per os at a high dosage to patients, known to be allergic against flower
pollen.
FH84 is presented in powder form in aluminum sachets and has been administered daily
per os (1 or 2 sachets). Each sachet contains 3g of FH84, which corresponds to 882
mg of Cernitin Extract {T60 (water-soluble components): 840 mg; GBX (fat-soluble
components): 42 mg}.
The patients have been treated in 4 centers in Lugano and Locarno in the southern part
of Switzerland.
The trial has been carried out as an open trial. For each patient a detailed Case Record
Form has been worked out and completed by the investigator(s).
Centers and Patients
The following 4 physicians participated in the trial:
| Center 1: |
Dr. R. Mazzi, Locarno (CH) (Principal Investigator) |
| Center 2: |
Dr. G. Bolognini, Mendrisio (CH) |
| Center 3: |
Dr. S. Gilardi, Locarno (CH) |
| Center 4: |
Dr. T. Pani, Lugano (CH) |
The patients have been divided as follows:
Table 1: Distribution of patients according to centers, sex and
age
| |
Center |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Total |
| |
Number of patients |
22 |
13 |
5 |
5 |
45 |
| Sex: |
Men |
10 |
9 |
3 |
4 |
26 |
| |
Women |
12 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
19 |
| Age: |
Under 25 |
7* |
5 |
2 |
3 |
17 |
| |
Over 25 |
7* |
8 |
3 |
2 |
20 |
* for 8 patients of center 1 (1985) data on age are missing
Dosage
The normal dosage has been 1 sachet of FH84 per day. In center 2 however, 7 patients
out of 13 have been treated with a double dose of 2 sachets daily.
Results
The results of the treatment have been evaluated in two ways:
a) Effect of the treatment on the following of pollinosis:
- Pruritis
- Sneeze
- Rhinitis
- Conjunctivitis
- Asthma
The patient had to report on each symptom whether at the end of the treatment it has:
- completely disappeared
- much improvement
- moderately improved
- remained unchanged
- deteriorated
b) General assessment of the treatment:
The patient and the physician had to judge each one separately, whether the result of
the treatment has been considered as
- very good
- good
- mediocre
- non-satisfactory
Effect of FH84 on the symptoms of pollinosis
Table 2: Combined results 1985/86, 45 patients (figures are number of patients)
| |
Pruritis |
Sneeze |
Rhinitis |
Conjunct. |
Asthma |
| completely disappeared |
4 |
7 |
4 |
7 |
4 |
| much improved |
3 |
11 |
16 |
12 |
4 |
| moderately improved |
5 |
9 |
10 |
9 |
6 |
| unchanged |
6 |
11 |
13 |
11 |
6 |
| deteriorated |
1 |
|
|
|
|
A majority of patients reported moderate to substantial improvement for the symptoms
of Sneeze, Rhinitis and Conjunctivitis.
66,6% of the patients reported a positive response for Rhinitis, 62,2% for Conjunctivitis
and 60% for Sneeze.
Much improved and/or completely disappeared were: 44,4% for Rhinitis, 42,2% for
Conjunctivitis and 40% for Sneeze.
Detailed data for each center are found in table 1-8 of the annex of this report.
Even though the figures suggest quite a positive result for FH84, one has to consider the
high placebo effect, the low number of patients and lack of statistical evaluation.
General Assessment of the treatment
Data on each patient concerning age, sex, dosage, start and end of the treatment, as
well as concerning the assessment of the treatment are found in table 10-13 of the
annex to this report.
The combined results of all 4 centers are shown in the following table:
Table 3: Combined results of the treatment of FH84, 1985/86, 45 patients
| Centers |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Total |
% |
| Results |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| very good |
2 |
1 |
- |
3 |
6 |
13.3 |
| good |
8 |
9 |
- |
1 |
18 |
40.0 |
| mediocre |
5 |
1 |
- |
1 |
7 |
15.6 |
| non-satisfactory |
7 |
2 |
5 |
- |
14 |
31.1 |
| adverse effects |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
68.9% of the patients responded positively to the drug. Good to very good response has
been achieved by 53.3%. Over 15% showed a mediocre result and 31.1% did not
respond at all.
Adverse Reactions to FH84
It is remarkable to notice that no adverse reactions (allergies) have been observed or
reported due to the treatment with Cernitin Pollen Extract. One has to recall the high
dosage of Pollen Extract in FH84 (corresponding to more than 10 tablets Cernilton/day)
and the sensitivity of the special selected patients, who are generally allergic to flower
pollen.
From the present trial can be concluded, that per os intake of Cernilton Extract up to
882 mg/day do not cause any allergic reactions.
7 patients of center 2 have been treated with 1764 mg/day and did not show adverse
reactions.
Effect of the treatment in function of the genus
The following table shows that there is no substantial difference concerning the sex,
except that the assessment of "very good" is rarer in the groups of women.
Table 5
| |
Number of Patients |
% of patients |
| M |
F |
M |
F |
| Total of patients |
26 |
19 |
100 |
100 |
| Results: |
|
|
|
|
| Very good |
5 |
1 |
19.2 |
5.3 |
| Good |
10 |
8 |
38.5 |
42.1 |
| Mediocre |
4 |
3 |
15.4 |
15.8 |
| Non satisfactory |
7 |
7 |
26.9 |
36.8 |
Effect of treatment in function of age
Table 6
| |
Number of patients |
% of patients |
| Under 25 |
Over 25 |
Under 25 |
Over 25 |
| Total of patients |
17 |
20 |
100 |
100 |
| Results: |
|
|
|
|
| Very good |
3 |
2 |
17.6 |
10.0 |
| Good |
6 |
9 |
35.4 |
45.0 |
| Mediocre |
4 |
1 |
23.5 |
5.0 |
| Non satisfactory |
4 |
8 |
23.5 |
40.0 |
The only surprising difference is in the "mediocre" group, where under 25 years of age
there is a percentage of 23.5%, but over 25 years only 5%. It seems that many of the
over 25 years patients simply judge a mediocre result as "non satisfactory".
Effect of treatment in function of dosage
The results of center 2 (see table 11 of annex) clearly show a much more consistent
and better result by taking 2 sachets instead of 1 per day. All 7 patients report good to
very good results. Such a result has not been observed in any other group or center.
Start/end of treatment
The date of start or duration of the treatment did not influence the results.
Conclusions
Efficacy
The prophylactic intake of FH84 in spring has caused a certain relief in the symptoms of
patients suffering from pollinosis. Over 65% of the 45 patients reported of an
improvement of their conditions at the end of the treatment, especially concerning the
symptoms of Rhinitis, Conjunctivitis and Sneeze.
In this preliminary, open study no difference has been observed regarding sex and age of
the patients. Also, the beginning of the treatment, whether March or April, seemed not
to have any influence on the results.
However, a treatment with a double dose (2 sachets/day) definitely improved the
outcome of the treatment.
The present results have not been statistically analyzed. One has to take into
consideration the low number of patients and the high placebo effects, as well as the
varying weather conditions.
A final conclusion concerning the efficacy of the product will need a further trial with
more patients and a control group ideally the trail should be blinded.
Tolerability
The present study is however very convincing concerning the tolerability of FH84. At the
high dosage of 882 mg of Cernitin Flower Pollen Extract there has not been observed
any adverse effects, say allergies in all 38 patients receiving this dosage. Seven patients
receiving 1764 mg daily did also not show any allergic reaction. Thus, the conclusion is
justified, that Cernitin Pollen Extract (FH84) does not cause allergenicity when
administered orally.
Annex
- Data on single patients and evaluation of the therapy for each patient
- Effect of FH84 on the symptoms (Pruritis, Sneeze, Rhinitis, Conjunctivitis and
Asthma) Table 1-9
Dr. R. Mazzi, Center 1
|
Pat-
ient
Nbr
|
Initials
|
Sex
|
Age
|
Dosage
(Sachets/d)
|
Start
|
End
|
Adverse
Reactions
|
RESULTS |
|
very
good
|
good
|
medi-
ocre
|
non-satis-
factory
|
|
1985
1
|
P.F.
|
M
|
-
|
1
|
01.06.
|
01.07.
|
none
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
C.A.
|
M
|
-
|
1
|
15.03.
|
01.07.
|
stomach
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
3
|
A.R.
|
M
|
-
|
1
|
15.03.
|
01.07.
|
none
|
-*
|
-*
|
-*
|
-*
|
|
4
|
L.G.
|
M
|
-
|
1
|
15.03.
|
01.07.
|
none
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
5
|
G.N.
|
F
|
-
|
1
|
15.04.
|
15.06.
|
none
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
6
|
A.M.
|
M
|
-
|
1
|
15.01.
|
15.06.
|
none
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
7
|
Z.G.
|
F
|
-
|
1
|
01.05.
|
31.05.
|
none
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
8
|
A.A.
|
F
|
-
|
1
|
01.05.
|
15.06.
|
none
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
9
|
P.P.
|
F
|
-
|
1
|
01.05.
|
15.06.
|
none
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
1986
1
|
P.E.
|
F
|
47
|
1
|
20.03.
|
03.08.
|
none
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
2
|
C.N.
|
M
|
16
|
1
|
20.03.
|
03.08.
|
none
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
3
|
D.M.
|
F
|
19
|
1
|
18.03.
|
30.05.
|
none
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
4
|
P.G.
|
F
|
42
|
1
|
01.04.
|
26.07.
|
none
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
5
|
A.R.
|
M
|
21
|
1
|
01.04.
|
15.06.
|
none
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
K.D.
|
M
|
21
|
1
|
15.03.
|
15.04.
|
none
|
(X)
|
X
|
|
|
|
7
|
B.Q.
|
M
|
40
|
1
|
01.04.
|
16.06.
|
none
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
8
|
S.C.
|
F
|
46
|
1
|
02.04.
|
16.06.
|
none
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
9
|
I.R.
|
F
|
45
|
1
|
01.04.
|
04.06.
|
none
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
10
|
W.S.
|
F
|
26
|
1
|
30.04.
|
31.07.
|
none
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
11
|
M.M.
|
F
|
15
|
1
|
08.04.
|
29.06.
|
none
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
12
|
Z.G.
|
F
|
43
|
1
|
01.03.
|
30.06.
|
none
|
(X)
|
X
|
|
|
|
13
|
D.G.C.
|
M
|
20
|
1
|
08.04.
|
08.07.
|
none
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
14
|
E.U.
|
M
|
20
|
1
|
15.04.
|
15.06.
|
ECZ. ?**
|
|
|
|
X
|
* results not recorded (eliminated from final evaluation)
** irritation of pre-existing eczema (hands); objectively doubtful.
Dr. G. Bolognini, Center 2
Pat-
ient
Nbr |
Initials |
Sex |
Age |
Dosage
(Sachets/d) |
Start |
End |
Adverse
Reactions |
RESULTS |
| very good |
good |
medi-
ocre |
non-satis-
factory |
| 1985
1 |
C.M. |
M |
24 |
1 |
26.03. |
03.05. |
none |
|
X |
|
|
|
2 |
G.P. |
M |
38 |
1 |
01.03. |
30.05. |
none |
|
|
|
X |
|
3 |
C.N. |
F |
41 |
1 |
28.02. |
30.05. |
none |
|
X |
|
|
|
4 |
S.E. |
M |
42 |
1 |
04.03. |
30.05. |
none |
|
X |
|
|
|
5 |
M.L. |
M |
35 |
1 |
23.03. |
30.05. |
none |
|
|
|
X |
|
6 |
B.M. |
F |
19 |
1 |
26.03. |
19.06. |
none |
|
|
X |
|
| 1986
1 |
N.B. |
M |
48 |
2 |
01.03. |
31.05. |
none |
|
X |
|
|
|
2 |
C.N. |
F |
42 |
2 |
15.03. |
15.06. |
none |
|
X |
|
|
|
3 |
V.G. |
M |
22 |
2 |
15.03. |
15.07. |
none |
X |
|
|
|
|
4 |
B.M. |
M |
38 |
2 |
01.02. |
01.06. |
none |
|
X |
|
|
|
5 |
B.M. |
F |
20 |
2 |
15.03. |
30.05. |
none |
|
X |
|
|
|
6 |
M.A. |
M |
27 |
2 |
15.03. |
30.06. |
none |
|
X |
|
|
|
7 |
C.M. |
M |
24 |
2 |
14.03. |
30.06. |
none |
|
X |
|
|
Dr. S. Gilardi, Center 3
Pat-
ient Nbr |
Initials |
Sex |
Age |
Dosage (Sachets/d) |
Start |
End |
Adverse Reactions |
RESULTS |
| very good |
good |
medi-
ocre |
non-satis-
factory |
| 1986
1 |
B.S. |
M |
34 |
1 |
29.03. |
19.06. |
none |
|
|
|
X |
|
2 |
S.J. |
F |
37 |
1 |
15.05. |
05.07. |
none |
|
|
|
X |
|
3 |
B.E. |
M |
47 |
1 |
15.04. |
20.08. |
none |
|
|
|
X |
|
4 |
B.B. |
F |
16 |
1 |
07.04. |
20.08. |
none |
|
|
|
X |
|
5 |
C.G. |
M |
16 |
1 |
15.04. |
28.08. |
none |
|
|
|
X |
Dr. T. Pani, Center 4
Pat-
ient Nbr |
Initials |
Sex |
Age |
Dosage (Sachets/d) |
Start |
End |
Adverse Reactions |
RESULTS |
| very good |
good |
medi-
ocre |
non-satis-
factory |
| 1986
1 |
L.F. |
M |
30 |
1 |
24.02. |
22.04. |
none |
X |
|
|
|
|
2 |
N.G. |
F |
54 |
1 |
13.03. |
30.04. |
none |
X |
|
|
|
|
3 |
S.M. |
M |
20 |
1 (1.5.:2) |
01.04. |
23.05. |
none |
|
|
X |
|
|
4 |
S.L. |
M |
17 |
1 |
14.04. |
30.05. |
none |
|
X |
|
|
|
5 |
M.S. |
M |
16 |
1 |
15.04. |
13.05. |
none |
X |
|
|
|
Table 1: Results of Center 1, 1985, 8 patients (Dr. R. Mazzi)
| |
Pruritis |
Sneeze |
Rhinitis |
Conjunct. |
Asthma |
|
completely disappeared |
|
|
1 |
1 |
|
|
much improved |
|
2 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
moderately improved |
|
3 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|
unchanged |
|
2 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
|
deteriorated |
|
|
|
|
|
Table 2: Results of Center 1, 1986, 14 patients (Dr. R. Mazzi)
| |
Pruritis |
Sneeze |
Rhinitis |
Conjunct. |
Asthma |
|
completely disappeared |
3 |
|
|
2 |
2 |
|
much improved |
1 |
5 |
5 |
2 |
1 |
|
moderately improved |
4 |
5 |
3 |
4 |
|
|
unchanged |
1 |
4 |
5 |
5 |
1 |
|
deteriorated |
1 |
|
|
|
|
Table 3: Combined results of Center 1, 1985 and 1986, 22 patients(Dr. R.
Mazzi)
| |
Pruritis |
Sneeze |
Rhinitis |
Conjunct. |
Asthma |
|
completely disappeared |
3 |
|
1 |
3 |
2 |
|
much improved |
1 |
7 |
6 |
3 |
1 |
|
moderately improved |
4 |
8 |
6 |
6 |
1 |
|
unchanged |
1 |
6 |
7 |
6 |
2 |
|
deteriorated |
|
|
|
|
|
Table 4: Results of Center 2, 1985, 6 patients (Dr. G. Bolognini)
| |
Pruritis |
Sneeze |
Rhinitis |
Conjunct. |
Asthma |
|
completely disappeared |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
much improved |
|
|
3 |
3 |
1 |
|
moderately improved |
|
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
unchanged |
|
|
2 |
2 |
|
|
deteriorated |
|
|
|
|
|
Table 5: Results of Center 2, 1986, 7 patients (Dr. G. Bolognini)
| |
Pruritis |
Sneeze |
Rhinitis |
Conjunct. |
Asthma |
|
completely disappeared |
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
much improved |
1 |
4 |
5 |
5 |
2 |
|
moderately improved |
|
1 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
|
unchanged |
|
|
|
|
|
|
deteriorated |
|
|
|
|
|
Table 6: Combined results of Center 2, 1985 and 1986, 13 patients(Dr. G.
Bolognini)
| |
Pruritis |
Sneeze |
Rhinitis |
Conjunct. |
Asthma |
|
completely disappeared |
|
2 |
|
|
1 |
|
much improved |
1 |
4 |
8 |
8 |
3 |
|
moderately improved |
|
1 |
3 |
3 |
5 |
|
unchanged |
|
|
2 |
2 |
|
|
deteriorated |
|
|
|
|
|
Table 7: Results of Center 3, 1986, 5 patients (Dr. S. Gilardi)
| |
Pruritis |
Sneeze |
Rhinitis |
Conjunct. |
Asthma |
|
completely disappeared |
|
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
much improved |
|
|
|
|
|
|
moderately improved |
|
|
|
|
|
|
unchanged |
5 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
4 |
|
deteriorated |
|
|
|
|
|
Table 8: Results of Center 4, 1986, 5 patients (Dr. T. Pani)
| |
Pruritis |
Sneeze |
Rhinitis |
Conjunct. |
Asthma |
|
completely disappeared |
1 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
1 |
|
much improved |
1 |
|
2 |
1 |
|
|
moderately improved |
1 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
unchanged |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
deteriorated |
|
|
|
|
|
Table 9: Combined results of all 4 Centers 1985 and 1986, 45 patients
| |
Pruritis |
Sneeze |
Rhinitis |
Conjunct. |
Asthma |
|
completely disappeared |
4 |
7 |
4 |
7 |
4 |
|
much improved |
3 |
11 |
16 |
12 |
4 |
|
moderately improved |
5 |
9 |
10 |
9 |
6 |
|
unchanged |
6 |
11 |
13 |
11 |
6 |
|
deteriorated |
1 |
|
|
|
|
Results
% Inhibition (=100-(inhibit/uninhibit) x100)
| Konc. |
T60, ZB 207 |
Last Modified on Sunday, August 27, 2006
|